On one hand you are right. On the other Hand
- Arturia profits from positive Feedback in Forums, so they also have to live with the negative
- DSI did something after a petition and some magazine contacts
- at least the bugs should have been fixed long time ago
- one man SYNTHSTROM does wonders.
- at no point i left a doubt that i regard the MB as high as an EMS synth which is max praise from my side for a monosynth
- and yes, ARTURIA said, they are working on something. Still they cannot give Details on what and when. And i think it would be good for them
if there are some more detailled announcements
i thought about all that before and i did not want to damage them in any way. But if you Google "customer service" and Arturia,
then you might discover there is some air for improvements on their side.
And last but not least - since i had the "entitlement" discussion many times on elektronauts:
i think, we, the customers have a right for the best possible software (including enough program space).
I think it usually is nonsense to ask for hardware improvements (although often in synth history users were very happy
about one or the other), but software has to be top notch. period.