This is something I've been trying to give more thought to when considering purchase decisions as of late. Some synths already have their replacement sitting in R&D when they hit the shelves. I don't like the "dump it and get the newest thing" mentality all that much, but some makers try to force us into that. Wonder how long Coltrane played the same sax?
Kurzweil and Long Term Platform SupportAt this point, I'm more more interested in investing into a "platform" that I'm pretty sure will stick around for awhile and continue to be developed. In the synth world at this point, I really believe Kurzweil has managed this quite well. Though I've seen some say "VAST is getting a little long in the tooth", my guess is that they've never actually learned to program the thing! VAST was leaps and bounds beyond anything else when it came out, and pretty much still is. Kurz still happily provides support for your 2600 and all your hard programming work on the 2600 is FORWARDS COMPATIBLE with the newer Kurz instruments out today. I can't think of another case of this anywhere!
My last major purchase wasn't a 2600 though. Just didn't have that much money sitting around at the time....
The Alesis Fusion - Good Idea Gone Bad?I had access to someone at Alesis, and was carefully watching the development of the Fusion. Alesis led many of us to believe that the Fusion was going to be their "Kurz 2600", and would be a development platform that they would continue to upgrade and support for a very long time. It had the processing power inside to do way more than it could do, and those of us that purchased one were mostly led to believe there would be "way more" too.
It didn't happen that way for the Fusion though. Marketing forced it out the door before it was ready, the very people that were waiting for it to come out crucified it online in forums (some never even having played the thing) because of the incomplete feature set and poor initial presets (a stupid thing to base an instrument on) - and the online bickering escalated and ultimately pretty well destroyed continued development of an instrument that should have had a much brighter future and longer life.
I still have mine. Yes, it's unfinished. But looking under the hood, I still have an instrument that kicks some serious butt in the programming department, once you wrap your head around it. Physical modeling, FM, Analogue modeling - all with "near modular" modulation capabilities and higher polyphony than most anything else. Name another synth other than the Nord Modular series that will let you call up 6 LFO's, and modulate all six with sources from EACH OTHER to create a chaos generator worthy of your neighbour's Buchla.
The Fusion isn't a perfect instrument, it has an interface that you either hate or go "uhhhhhh", but it's a very deep and versatile beast if you get into programming it. I only feel slighted because I didn't get the continued development of the instrument that many thought would be there.
I'd be remiss to not give Alesis a few nods though. They listened to those of us that would speak with reason about the instrument, quickly released a number of OS updates fixing as many bugs as they could, brought in a several noted sound development companies (especially Hollow Sun) to improve the available sound set. If you got a later model from Sweetwater, for example, you got a number of Sweetwater specific sound set, all the Hollow Suns sets - there's an astounding amount of variety in there that go far past the original sound set - if you're into presets. (I'm not).
Which, brings us to the Origin.First admission. I don't own an Origin. Therefor, I am not qualified or technically allowed to criticize it. Nothing makes me angrier than folks willing to blast something they don't own and probably have never even played!
The Origin will probably be my next major purchase. Arturia, from what I can tell, has a long term commitment to the Origin, and there's enough horsepower under the hood for them to continue improving, upgrading, and adding new features and models for a good time to come. As I hang here and continue to read these forums, I do feel that I will be purchasing into a platform that won't get dumped next week for "the next big thing". Hopefully, if the "next big thing" is something cool, they'll figure out how to implement some of it into the Origin, put another OS update out there, and everybody with one will be happy.
For those impatiently waiting on the next OS update, hey, these things take time to get right! Better to take longer than you feel it should than go out, have bugs, and then have folks screaming about the bugs, yes? As a beta tester for several companies (I do not test for Arturia), at least I can appreciate this part of the process. Arturia seems to be making sure it's *right* before they release. That scores points in my book.
I really waiting to see the Arp 2600 emulation. And, who knows - maybe we'll get an interesting FM model, some physical modeling of some type, or granular synthesis functions in the future. The hardware seem capable of it if the software is willing...
OT: Ultimate test of "patience". See the modular here:
http://lesmizz.typepad.com/Anybody want to guess how long it took to get the Milton Sequencer on the top row?
Comment from Arturia?Would actually love for someone from Arturia to chime in here. Though I'm fully aware that you're probably limited by what you can say about future development, I think many of us would love to hear your thoughts (at least those you can discuss) on long-term commitment to the Origin...